Showing posts with label film. Show all posts
Showing posts with label film. Show all posts

September 4, 2013

Vera Wang's Idea: Be Real



Recently an interview with American fashion designer, Vera Wang aired on television. She made an interesting statement about her conception of design and other designers. It was an observation about the reality of matter.
She stated that designers who live in a fantasy world, who live in their heads, who do not make frequent contact with the most immediate moment-- now the present moment, are those who fail to communicate, to address the needs and wants of the consumer. 
Her clients have needs, wishes and dreams of their own and she addresses these things by attentively listening and engaging her design work in that direction. She participates in the 'give and take' of cooperation.

Wang summed up the work of some others by saying, who cares, what is there to care about? What can you contribute to society, to the world through fantasy?
A simply remarkable thought; it pinned down the reason why a film I recently viewed was so singularly bad that of the 15 persons who came to see it, all but 3 left before the film was over. From the point of the spectators, a room full of competent designers and artists, many who appeared in the film made like rubes and ingenues, not underground artists or cultural observers. This, an incredibly accomplished designer, Wang made clear.
This Simple Mind was admittedly the last out the door, leaving the few remaining to chat with its film maker, Yaghoobian.
Yes, it was that bad. Perhaps the host had not pre-viewed the film prior to offering it for a showing?

Died Young Stayed Pretty by aspiring Canadian film maker Eileen Yaghoobian was the film in question. Perhaps Yaghoobian  did not research her topic carefully, had little or no expertise in the subject matter, or gave over the interview process to the persons she interviewed. Those interviewed on camera about being "underground poster artists" did do 98 percent of the talking, and it wasn't all reality based talk either.
Being Canadian it may be that Yaghoobian was overly awed by American southerners who for the first time have a camera and microphone in their face and proceed to vent, or Pacific Northwesterners' regionalism.

But what about the editing process? Yaghoobian reports she spent months at it, and what she was left with is what Vera Wang presciently identified as the lack of reality for a subject that may not matter. This is a film that may be easily overlooked.

May 4, 2013

Springtime, A Temperate Mood

SONNET 116
by William Shakespeare
view video1
This Love, Sarah Brightman

"Let me not to the marriage of true minds
admit impediments. Love is not love
which alters when it alteration finds,
Or bends with the remover to remove.
O no, it is an ever fixed mark
that looks on tempests and is never shaken;
it is the star to every wandering bark,whose worth’s unknown,
although his height be taken.

Love’s not time’s fool, though rosy lips and cheeks
within his bending sickle’s compass come:
love alters not with his brief hours and weeks,
but bears it out even to the edge of doom.

If this be error and upon me proved,
I never writ, nor no man ever loved."

Compare the original above with a modern version here for meaning:

"I hope I may never acknowledge any reason why minds that truly love each other shouldn’t be joined together. Love isn’t really love if it changes when it sees the beloved change or if it disappears when the beloved leaves.

Oh no, love is a constant and unchanging light that shines on storms without being shaken; it is the star that guides every wandering boat. And like a star, its value is beyond measure, though its height can be measured. Love is not under time’s power, though time has the power to destroy rosy lips and cheeks.
Love does not alter with the passage of brief hours and weeks, but lasts until Doomsday. If I’m wrong about this and can be proven wrong, I never wrote, and no man ever loved. "


While casting for a topic, I came upon an intriguing video composition combining the famed novelist, Jane Austin's (there are three novels in the series), Sense and Sensibility, Shakespeare's sonnet 116 and the modern, English soprano singer Sarah Brightman performing This Love. Quite a combination! It's not what one might expect.

Even a simple mind doesn't easily put it all together. But further consideration gives the idea from Jane Austin, that in the middle way, a temperate mood is beneficial to one's life and happiness.There is something to the idea that a calm, steadiness lends itself to prosperity when standing on shifting ground.
The plot of the novel (written in 1811) illustrates this value, strengthened with Shakespeare's words that a true love is real, and remains, unfoundered. And while I can't ascertain the logic or philosophy engaged by the maker of the video, nor the sense or appropriateness of its music or lyric combined with the novel, I think it attracts because of the strong soprano voice of Sarah Brightman and an emotion she conveys when paired to the visuals of the movie. It forms a sort of synthesis which says more than either alone.

And I suppose one must read "between the lines" to find the meaning in it all. Finally, it is the music--maybe-- surely (maybe minus the lyrics) that seems to offer some kind of answer.